Social Media Measurement: Are you getting value out of Twitter and its peers?

The topic of social media measurement is almost as hot as the topic of social media. With only a few years of consistent data, we still remain in the shadow of the econometric models of the olden days, built for measuring the outcomes of PR and branding efforts.

The novelty and uncertainty of the field certainly haven’t stopped the burgeoning cottage industry of self-inaugurated gurus. This combination of ambiguity and hucksterism might scare off the ROI-driven marketer.

Now I am certainly not a social media marketing nay-sayer. Like most marketers, my gut tells me that there’s great opportunity here. However, the scientist in me demands evidence. And in business, evidence is ultimately in the ROI.

Do ROI and Social Media go together?

I was quite perplexed by one author’s argument that while social media marketing creates value, it may not deliver an ROI. I will leave the debate about whether social media marketing should deliver an ROI in the first place to another time. Today, I wanted to turn to a small sliver of a large study that MarketingSherpa published earlier this year in its Social Media Benchmark Guide.

sherpa chart 300x267 Social Media Measurement: Are you getting value out of Twitter and its peers?This chart (click on chart to enlarge) displays how frequently various metrics are utilized by marketers as they attempt to quantify the effect of their social media efforts. My immediate impression was that there were broadly two types of metrics listed here:

  1. the more traditional website analytics and bottom-line-related measurements and
  2. buzzword-laden, social media-specific measurements with intuitive, but likely only anecdotal, relationships with outcomes.

What this chart wasn’t telling me was whether marketers were likely to mix these approaches, or were loyal to either one or the other. I enlisted MarketingExperiments’ experienced research analyst and statistics guru, Arturo Silva, to help get a little deeper into the data.

What Marketers Tend to Do

sherpa graph 240x300 Social Media Measurement: Are you getting value out of Twitter and its peers?

Using principal component analysis, he was able to paint a different picture from the more flat utilization frequency account. Without getting into the technical details of the loading plot, what this diagram (click on diagram to enlarge) shows us is how likely each of the responses above are to be given in conjunction with one another. In other words, which activities these marketers are likely to measure together.

The vectors indeed bunched up quite nicely. Leads Generated, Search Engine Rankings, Visitors and Sources of Traffic, and Sales Conversions or Other ROI Metrics are grouped together toward the top (by the way, the exact direction of the vectors here is irrelevant—what’s important is their confluence).

Network Size, Competitive Share of Coverage, Engagement with Influentials, and Progress toward Social Media Objectives also were tightly grouped. This means that if a marketer was measuring network size, she was also likely measuring the other three items I just listed, and was less likely to measure the first four.

ROI vs. non-ROI Metrics

Altogether, even though the non-ROI metrics are not all plotted next to each other, they stand in stark contrast to the more traditional and ROI-based ones. That is, marketers are typically looking at either one set or the other.

I am sure that a big part of the reason for this separation has to do with the tools that marketers use. Traditional analytics packages have little or no support for social media measurement, and conversely the new crop of social media management tools lack web analytics components and don’t connect with transactional data. The converse may be true as well—marketers choose their tools based on their interest in either side of the story.

Measure what matters most

What concerned me was how poorly some of the metrics that I would consider critical for marketers, like Leads Generated (for B2B) and Sales Conversion (for everyone) compared with measurements like Network Size and Sentiment, which haven’t proven to be predictors of bottom-line outcomes.

Paris Hilton may be considered a highly trusted influencer according to some unscrupulous Twitter data-crunching tools, but aren’t her Twitter stats just a reflection of the pre-existing celebrity status? Twitter stats (and I am focusing on Twitter because its simplicity makes the new metrics easier to understand, not just because it’s an easy target for pundits) are a measurement of reach, but not of impact. Content analysis tools can measure sentiment of comments, but not their effect on the business.

Intuitively we know that more reach means more impact, and nicer comments mean more satisfied customers (who will influence others). However, measuring the impact of each would require either taking a deep dive into the psyches of a large number of social media participants, or (more realistically) looking at how all the metrics, all the way down to resulting changes in revenues and expenses, fluctuate in response to the changes in the social media end (or rather, top) of the funnel.

So how do you determine the ROI of social media?

In today’s live web clinic, MarketingSherpa’s Research Director, Sergio Balegno, will join me in discussing how the value of social media activities can be derived from bottom-line results, giving business-level meaning to intermediate metrics like Quality of Commentary.

I want your feedback as well. Leave a comment and let me know how you measure your social media efforts. Our favorite comment will win a free seat (a $499 value) at an upcoming stop of the 2010 Online Marketing ROI Tour.

UPDATE: Congratulations to Jon Rognerud, our favorite commenter and winner of the free seat at an upcoming stop of the Tour.

 Social Media Measurement: Are you getting value out of Twitter and its peers?

Fascinating New Adwords Placement Test

Google announced on their LatLong (Maps) blog today that they’re experimenting with placing pricing for hotels directly next to the hotel listings in Google Maps.

At first glance, it looked like another Google-internal affiliate marketing initiative, but it’s actually quite clever.

Here’s the official sample screenshot – Look closely at the price listing drop-down box in Adwords yellow:

hotelad1 Fascinating New Adwords Placement Test

If nothing else, it’s an innovative way to roll in Adwords results directly into the organic SERPs.

Paid Placement With a Twist

Interestingly, Google’s post points out explicitly that these listings are not traditional paid placements:

This new feature will not change the way that hotels are ranked in Google Maps. Google Maps ranks business listings based on their relevance to the search terms entered, along with geographic distance (where indicated) and other factors, regardless of whether there is an associated price.

So the blur between paid and organic continues it’s inevitable march forward.

It’s also of note that Google has chosen affiliate sites like Expedia and Priceline as their preferred advertiser testing partners for this experiment, not the hotels themselves…

It will be interesting to see how this progresses, and what other verticals it shows up in.

SXSWi Recap: The digital culture embraces testing

As you may recall from my last post, I spent nearly six days in Austin, TX attending SXSW Interactive, a conference which Advertising Age once famously referred to as the bellwether for what lies ahead for digital culture.

The event was a fantastic gathering of ideas, technology and core conversations – the kind of conversations that tend to happen when the Internet takes a moment to meet in person and exchange fancy business cards.

Test everything?

And speaking of fancy business cards, for this event MarketingExperiments ran an A/B split test version of our business cards. For those keeping count, Side B won, although the results are far from being statistically significant.

(click below to see the two treatments)

side a 150x150 SXSWi Recap: The digital culture embraces testing side b 150x150 SXSWi Recap: The digital culture embraces testing

But what the cards were able to prove is that the future of online testing is brighter than ever! While panels focused on a wide-range of topics from content development and management to social media and design standards, I spoke to a number of Web 2.0 designers, business owners and service providers all fascinated with the prospect of testing their pages, registration paths and email.

Test more?

Even more exciting is that many of these people were already testing on their own sites. One such tester, FanBridge co-founder Noah Dinkin, was especially interested in discussing testing strategies as he has attended several of our webinars here at MarketingExperiments.

FanBridge is a site that allows someone (such as a musician) to manage a list of their fans. In this way, FanBridge must focus not only on attracting new signups to its own service, but to help their current subscribers effectively communicate to their own fans. Noah, who said he tests using Google Website Optimizer, confided in me what many of us already know. He is testing some, but he needs to be testing more.

Test the right thing

This was a common theme in many of my discussions as I met people who were interested in testing and knew they should be testing, but were often unsure where to start. And I think, like any problem, the answer starts with research.

Resources such as this blog or our webinars are a great resource for anyone looking to see what testing is all about and see some real-world case studies.

I think we can all agree that the benefits of testing are such that we cannot continue to implement untested best practices or design standards without measuring the impact of our changes to the bottom line. The question becomes how many conversions can you afford to give away?

Because whether you run a Web 2.0 service application that receives five visits per day or manage an ecommerce site that receives 50,000 visits, your landing pages, cart processes and emails will determine whether or not you end up with a customer or a bounce.

Thanks to everyone I met at SXSW, and good luck testing!

 SXSWi Recap: The digital culture embraces testing

Establishing Credibility & Maintaining Trust

Constructing a winning landing page has a lot to do with establishing credibility in the mind of the visitor.

You need a compelling offer, of course, but you also need to frame that offer in a way your audience will listen to, accept, and want to respond.

Let’s look at ways to optimize landing page credibility.

Trustworthy Design

A website credibility study in 2006 undermined lot of traditional thinking about website credibility metrics that were taken as given. For example, only 1% of respondents thought a privacy policy was important in terms of establishing trust. People didn’t care about sponsorships. Or the identity of the site owner.

The overwhelming credibility metric was in fact site design – typography, graphics and overall look and feel.

The data showed that the average consumer paid far more attention to the superficial aspects of a site, such as visual cues, than to its content. For example, nearly half of all consumers (or 46.1%) in the study assessed the credibility of sites based in part on the appeal of the overall visual design of a site, including layout, typography, font size and color schemes.

Start with a checklist:

  • Do you have a reliable, fast host?
  • Is your web design professional, as opposed to amateur-looking?
  • Are your pages usable?
  • Is your copy compelling?
  • Is your visual identity unique?

This checklist, I’m sure you’ll agree, is common sense.

If you’ve managed to get someone to click through, you don’t want to lose them to basic problems, such as a slow host, or poor usability. To achieve every item on this checklist will cost less than what many advertisers would stand to lose in back-clicks.

All these aspects help to establish trust, but that’s only the beginning.

Why Is Trust Important?

It sounds like an obvious question. Few would argue that it is better not to be trusted.

In terms of PPC, one of the most important benefits of establishing trust is financial. If you can retain visitors, by engaging with them in such a way as they want to bookmark your site, or buy from you again, then you save in PPC costs in future. If you build up a user base, then you may not need to advertise via PPC much, thus saving you money.

Trust is the essential underlying ingredient for relationship marketing to work.

Compare this strategy with a typical approach to PPC, which is to convert the new visitor to a sale as soon as possible.

Granted, this approach suits some products and services, but this approach will always suffer from a strategic flaw: the constant need to attract new customers. As we looked at in our relationship marketing post, attracting new customers can be five times as expensive as maintaining existing customers. As your niche gets more competitive, and copy-cats move in, your PPC costs are forced up.

It’s very difficult for a competitor to duplicate a long-term trust relationship. Once a trust relationship is established, which starts with the credibility of the page and extends to the quality of the interactions the visitor has with you, it becomes harder for a competitor not focused on building trust to emulate you.

It Helps If You’re Interested

Whilst you can sell if you’re not really interested in a product or service, it’s much easier if you do genuinely believe in what you’re doing.

It certainly helps with building trust, because in order to make a connection with people, you need to understand how they think.

People who have spent a lot of time in a niche naturally talk the customers language, because they have constant exposure to it. Compare this with someone who writes for a niche with which they are unfamiliar. The writing, and approach, typically feels clunky. The same is often true of translations, or when marketing in a culture that is not similar to your own.

Summary

Establishing visitor trust has two parts.

First, the initial impression must be good. So invest in good design, good copywriting, and usability.

Secondly, the ongoing interactions you have with visitors. Respond to inquiries promptly, be consistent, be user-focused and adapt to user requirements.

Testing Madness: What the odds of picking a perfect NCAA Tournament bracket can teach us about running valid tests

Several companies are offering multi-million dollar rewards to anyone who can pick a perfect bracket in the NCAA Tournament. Sounds like a good deal, doesn’t it? You can enter for free, and the chances must be better than the lottery, right?

Ask yourself…what do you think the odds are? Maybe one in a million. Perhaps one in 50 million.

Barack Obama fills out bracket 300x168 Testing Madness: What the odds of picking a perfect NCAA Tournament bracket can teach us about running valid testsOr maybe you put a little more effort into it and do a few basic calculations. You figure that in the first round of 32 games, the probability of having a perfect prediction is one in four billion.

So if you’re prone to extrapolate you might think that, for the total 63 games in the championship, the overall chance would be something like one in eight billion, right? Logically speaking there are twice as many games, so half the probability.

I was wondering myself, so I actually ran the numbers. The chance of predicting a perfect bracket for March Madness is one in 9.22 quintillion. That’s one in nine billion billions. In other words, you have a better chance of getting struck by lightning, being hit by a meteor, and winning the Mega Millions lottery.

But wait – I know my college basketball

“But wait,” you say. “I’ve been following college basketball and I know which teams have a better chance of winning. No way Arkansas-Pine Bluff has any chance of beating Duke.”

Fair enough. In the above example, I used a random-result probability model (a 50/50 chance for every game). So I also created an informed-result probability model.

In this model, I assumed that the higher-ranked team had a two-thirds chance of winning in the first two rounds (after that, it’s still anybody’s game). The chance now is one in 9.29 trillion. Much improved, but still amazingly long odds.

But wait – I know my customers

There’s a greater lesson to be learned here for testing. Chance is an intuitive concept but estimating chance is not.

When running an online test, chance has to be accounted for. We can’t rely on intuition or a feeling that we know what our customers want. We can’t just assume that because we got the results we hoped for that the results are significant or a test has run long enough.

We need to implement the appropriate statistical validation to assure that what we are seeing is not just random chance, but likely representative of our market as a whole.

Bad data equals bad decisions

Here is an extreme example to show you what I’m talking about. Let’s assume we turn a test and our treatment page gets four visitors. If three visitors buy, and one visitor bounces, we cannot assume that 75% of our traffic will buy. Because once we get to 10 visitors, we may find that now six have bounced.

While the above example is obvious, not every testing scenario is. Perhaps you’ve run the test for a week and feel like that is long enough. Or the sample size seems quite large. Or, and perhaps the biggest danger which I referenced above, you feel that you know your customers well enough that when a result comes along that you were hoping to see, you’re prepared to stop testing.

Making a business decision based on any of these scenarios is a dangerous thing. And therein lies the power of true statistical validity. We are given an assurance (for example, 95%) that the results from the test we just ran can be relied upon and not attributed just to chance. This way, when we duplicate across the entire population (assuming we tested on a representative sample), we’ll sensibly be expecting similar results.

By doing so we never completely eliminate the chance of an unpredictable event (one in 9.29 trillion is still possible), but we gain a strong enough understanding of it to confidently make bottom-line decisions based on quality data.

 Testing Madness: What the odds of picking a perfect NCAA Tournament bracket can teach us about running valid tests

Goodbye Infolinks

Today I finally disabled Infolinks for good. No, I’m not going back to Kontera either. I’m going sans in text links altogether. I decided to make the move last night after a comment from Laptop Briefcase, a long time reader on Blueverse.com. It wasn’t the comment that made me decide to do away with the [...]

Thank you for subscribing to Blueverse!

Goodbye Infolinks

 Goodbye Infolinks  Goodbye Infolinks  Goodbye Infolinks

 Goodbye Infolinks

Relationship Marketing & PPC

Pay-per-click strategy tends to focus on direct sales and transactional marketing techniques. An advertiser bids a certain amount, achieves a CTR of X, and sells X number of goods and services.

Let’s take a look at another strategy, relationship marketing, and how it can be rolled into your PPC and web strategy.

What Is Relationship Marketing?

Relationship marketing is the process of building customer retention and satisfaction by leveraging the existing contact you have with customers. It is a strategy based around the long-term value of repeat customers, as opposed to a strategy whereby you constantly seek to get in front of new customers.

The benefits are obvious.

It’s easier to sell to someone who already trusts you to deliver, and it’s cheaper to talk to them than it is to talk to new customers. You don’t need to spend much time educating these customers, as they are already familiar with you, and what your provide. The occasional email offer might be all that is required to get ongoing sales.

Relationship marketing is suited to competitive business environments where businesses sell a variety of goods/services, have repeat periodic demand, or businesses that want to build an audience/subscriber base.

Why Is Relationship Marketing important?

Relationship marketing is a powerful way to build value, for both the customer and the merchant.

Let’s say you periodically use home services, such as gardening services. Initially, you hire a person to mow your lawns, which the provider undertakes diligently.

Because there is a relationship established, it is reasonably easy for the lawn mowing service to offer the customer a range of related, personalized services – such as yard clearing, tree pruning, and other home maintenance – because the trust/familiarity relationship is already established.

The gardening service supplier knows your layout, and has a good idea of what needs to be done in future. He can plan and tailor a customized service for you, at little extra marketing cost. This is good for you, the customer, too, because it means you don’t have to go hunting and screening suppliers to carry out each task. The value of the service is increased, because the relationship adds value.

All from one marketing spend.

Relationship marketing can also be seen as a defensive form of marketing. i.e. holding on to the customers you already have.

In mature, competitive environments, other businesses are trying to gain customers, typically at the expense of their competitors. If you build in relationship value, then it is difficult for clients to switch away from you, without losing value.

Industry studies have shown that to attract a new customer costs five times what it does to retain an existing one. It is therefore worth taking time away from tweaking PPC minutiae focused on acquiring new customers, and spend some time looking at the overall strategy, and how you can keep those customers you already have.

How To Integrate Relationship Marketing

The integration of relationship marketing happens at your strategy stage. Use PPC to gather new prospects, then ensure that you back-end customer acquisition with a means to enhance three key areas:

  • Customer Qualification
  • Customer Satisfaction
  • Customer Retention

In many areas a 3% conversion rate is fairly strong, which means that there is little to no value delivered by the other 97% of the traffic. Rather than trying to make the sale off a cold search click, you can offer something free of value they can download in exchange for their information. A quick guide, a cheat sheet, an autoresponder series, etc. Build trust and then make the sale. Give people multiple paths to convert.

In terms of customer satisfaction, pay close attention to what makes people happy. Consider under-promising and over-delivering, personalization, and on-going discounts for repeat business. There is software available that you can use to track customer habits, likes and dislikes. Look for any opportunities where you can develop one-on-one marketing.

For example, Amazon and other online retailers use sales history as a means to personalize their offerings to repeat customers. The value to both parties is increased, as Amazon is more likely to be in tune with a customers preferences than another book retailer who knows little or nothing about them.

Look to retain customers by providing them value they don’t get elsewhere. Again, consider loyalty discounts, customization and personalization, and other customer-centric services. Customers do change suppliers, often out of boredom as opposed to any deficiency on the part of the supplier, so try to keep your offering fresh and updated.

One simple way to provide both satisfaction and retention is to enhance your communication channels. Encourage your customers to talk to you. Answer emails promptly, use a blog/RSS/forums and any other channels you customers use. People like to be heard, and will often volunteer a lot of information if simply given the opportunity to do so.

Once the conversation starts, much value can emerge.

Antisocial Media: Social media marketing success does not lie in you

“…I can’t deny the fact that you like me, right now, you like me!” – Sally Field

Social media just makes us all feel so darn good, doesn’t it? I mean, look at me, my name and picture is right there in the upper left. Back in my advertising days, I had ads run in The Wall Street Journal and USA Today, but no one would ever know, since my name wasn’t attached.

And I’ve got followers on Twitter. And LinkedIn. And…

Sorry, did I just become an egoblogger?

On second thought…don’t look at me

3133347219 4c16658dd5 300x252 Antisocial Media: Social media marketing success does not lie in youThis is why most social media marketing is so, well, outright bad. To go back to that study by Pear Analytics, 40% of tweets are “pointless babble.”

In a discussion last week with Pamela Markey, our Director of Marketing, she came up with the perfect phrase to describe this phenomenon – antisocial media.

Social is defined as “relating to human society and its members.” But, how many social media marketing practitioners are really relating to anything beyond what they are trying to promote?

Automatic for the people

To make matters worse, there are social media “experts” who sell products that offer to automate social media promotion and marketing.

One product I came across allows you to auto follow targeted Twitter profiles, rapidly increase niche Twitter followers, have unlimited Twitter profiles, automate direct messages, and, consequently, spend time on other tasks while the program works for you.

Feature rich but concept poor. This begs the question, what’s the point? (And the second question, can any software automate blog writing so I can spend time on other tasks? Where is HemingwayBlogger v3.0)?

So, what is the point then?

The point of social media is to give the people what they want, which is not necessarily what you want to tell them. That’s why social media marketing success does not lie in you, it lies in them.

Now I am not a social media marketing “expert” (which seems to be defined by having a five-figure following on Twitter), but there are certain discoveries we’ve made at MarketingExperiments that should logically work with these new platforms. Namely, the most important factor to conversion is motivation.

Let me take two real-world examples to show you what I mean.

Not only is Bill Gates richer than you, after only two months on Twitter, he already has more followers – 601,109. Then there’s That Guy (name changed to protect his anonymity). We were first tipped off to That Guy by a comment on this blog. That Guy has 84,466 followers.

Both pretty impressive. Now let’s look at another column on Twitter – “following.” Bill Gates is following 44 people. That Guy – 91,349. So how do you think That Guy got so many followers? Not only did he auto follow his way to “expertise,” he is trying to use that number of followers as a proof point for why you should buy his social media product.

Don’t be That Guy

In stark contrast, how did Bill Gates get so many followers? People likely want to hear what he has to say.

Of course, if you’re not a world-famous tech billionaire and philanthropist, people are likely less motivated to listen to you. But the same principle applies. Put yourself in your audience’s shoes. What can you tell them through social media that they’ll actually care about? How do they connect with your brand?

For example, I rarely tweet anything that’s not marketing related, but for a free Pearl Jam song I gladly added my 140 characters to the Twitterverse. Pamela is happy when she receives a 30% off coupon from J. Crew. And at MarketingExperiments we try to create valuable, free content that helps you do your job better.

My point is, there is no one right answer for how to use social media to tap into your audience’s motivations, but there is an answer for your brand.

And unless you tap into that motivation with your social media efforts, you’re just wasting your most valuable resource – time – while stroking your own ego at the huge “following” you have.

Am I right? Am I wrong? We’re listening. Use the Topsy button at the top of this post to tweet your opinion or leave a comment on this blog.

 Antisocial Media: Social media marketing success does not lie in you

Please Be My Friend: Taking the first step beyond just being on Facebook

Afraid you’ll be the last brand picked for the kickball team? Worried you’ll throw a big party and no one will come? Sometimes it can feel like social media marketing is another trip through middle school.

The greatest social media challenge marketers say they face is getting their target audience to engage and participate. According to MarketingSherpa’s 2010 Social Media Marketing Benchmark Report, 64% of marketers consider it a very important challenge to achieving social marketing objectives.

Translation: I’m a new kid in a new school and I’m worried no one will be my friend. So let’s take a look at a few Facebook beginner ideas…

This post is unusually tactical for me. I am assuming you already have a social media objective and strategy. You know WHY you need Facebook fans, and you know what to do with them.

When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a chance to send email

The knee-jerk digital marketing tactic is: hey, let’s send a note to all of our friends.

Sending email to your list is easy, but it’s another piece of spam that will get you unsubscribes. Just because you just embraced Facebook doesn’t mean that they did as well.

Instead, make it a reasonably distinct part of your site and whatever regular email you are already sending out to an opted-in list. People that are already on Facebook will recognize it easily. Don’t waste effort on trying to create new Facebook converts (unless your name is Mark Zuckerberg).

For a true friend, look a little deeper than your list

3647806235 e29a124766 300x235 Please Be My Friend: Taking the first step beyond just being on FacebookI would suggest deeper-reach strategies, starting from understanding your target audience and getting involved in related Facebook Groups. Through meaningful conversation, you can introduce them to your Page (or Group).

Facebook makes relevance fairly easy, if time consuming. Learning about both individuals and groups is naturally available through Facebook content. You can read wall posts, bios, etc.

This means dedicating some marketing or business development human resources to the project (the second biggest challenge according to MarketingSherpa, with 56% of marketers considering it very important). After all, relationships require time and effort.

Active, but measured and judicious participation with the objective of creating interest is what will net you a loyal following.

However, don’t neglect the narrower tactics of contests, special coupons or exclusive deals for your Facebook fans. While these incentives will on average create a less loyal following, their net effect can be very positive.

Understand what Facebook functionality will naturally (and free of charge) carry your message

In social media in general (and on Facebook in particular), retention and new member generation are very tightly related. Every time someone comments in your Page, it is reflected in their wall and visible to their friends, who can then learn about the group and join (individuals may change their settings, but this is the default option and happens most of the time).

You should look to all Facebook features that trigger visibility in people’s News Feeds. For example, creating events will push your Page into the News Feed of those that sign up for them. If you create a Facebook application, installing it (and some updates – wouldn’t you want to be another Farmville!) will generate a visible News Feed post.

There are other more creative tactics (may or may not apply to your Page depending on the tone), where you can invite people to tag themselves in an image, say, of personality types, etc.

Good luck. And let me just remind you of your Mom’s advice on the first day of middle school (assuming your Mom was a marketer). You’re a likable brand, don’t send out desperate notes for friends. Just go out there, be yourself, engage in the activities you love, and you’ll be the most popular brand in school.

 Please Be My Friend: Taking the first step beyond just being on Facebook

SXSW 2010 Preview: How will testing impact social media?

Every year, for the past 16 years, something amazing has happened in Austin, TX around this time. And this year hopes to be no different as Austin gears up for its annual South by Southwest Interactive technology conference – an event which can only be described as one of the largest, most exciting, most comprehensive collections of marketing and social web entertainment and technology this side of the Internet.

3841039707 9daf54b165 SXSW 2010 Preview: How will testing impact social media?In what amounts to five days of epic conversations, presentations and social media events disguised as a “technology conference,” the world (and all of Twitter) tunes in to see the Internet trends of the last year scrutinized and the trends for the next year laid out in incredible, Apple-Keynote-quality detail.

How far can testing go?

This year, MarketingExperiments will not only be tuning in, but will take part in this conversation to discover not just what works in email and landing page optimization, but what is working in social media and other areas of the Web as well. In addition to small and large business owners, how are bloggers, designers and the social media crowd testing, measuring and collecting results? What’s working, what isn’t, and what’s to come in 2010?

If there’s ever been an ongoing topic of conversation here at MarketingExperiments, it’s the ever-present question of how far we can go in testing. How do we improve and build upon the tools we have to increase ROI, discover new insights and push the boundaries of online testing to give us more accurate, more actionable results? How will social media continue to change the way we hold conversations and gain trust with our audience online? How will we measure and apply what we learn?

See you in Austin

What better way to seek out the answers to these questions than by employing SXSWi as my backdrop for a discussion on how the Internet will continue to evolve to the tune of testing and optimization, as well as hear first-hand how other marketers, bloggers, and Internet fans in general see online testing influencing the design and execution of ideas on the Web.

And if you happen to see me there, be sure to stop me and tell me your thoughts on these issues as well.  Also, ask me for one of my “split test” business cards. More on that later…

 SXSW 2010 Preview: How will testing impact social media?