Transparent Marketing: A slice of honesty from Domino’s Pizza

Let’s say you make mass-produced pizza that tastes like cardboard. How would you sell it?

A) Hire Jessica Simpson as a spokesperson to tell everyone how good your pizza tastes
B) Have your founder drive across the country in a classic sports car to tell everyone how great your pizza tastes
C) Launch a nationwide campaign to tell everyone how bad your pizza tastes (and then make it better)

Domino’s Pizza actually picked option C (and if they didn’t, really, would it be worth blogging about?). In fact, the cardboard reference above is something Domino’s itself is promoting…





This campaign is a great example of two principles we teach about in our training workshops

Transparent Marketing

So let’s get back to why I’m writing about a pizza campaign. It overcame one of the first hurdles in a crowded, overwhelming, thousands-of-sales-messages-per-day marketplace – it stood out. It grabbed my attention. And I even remembered the marketer’s name. How often can you say that about a pizza (or any other) marketing campaign?

As George Orwell has said, “In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” And, without being too harsh on my marketing peers, “universal deceit” is a pretty good summation of most marketing today. As Dr. Flint McGlaughlin has said, “When you say ‘sell,’ I hear ‘hype.’”

And that’s precisely why Transparent Marketing is so powerful. With the rise of social media, it is not hard for prospective customers to quickly learn the truth about your product. If you openly admit your weaknesses, you may be able to gain their trust. And, ultimately, every sale is an act of trust.

In Domino’s case, they are readily embracing social media – including every tweet, good or bad, right on their microsite:

dominos tweets Transparent Marketing: A slice of honesty from Domino’s Pizza

Optimization Sequence

Of course, if your weaknesses are big enough, simply admitting them isn’t enough. You actually have to improve. Let’s take a quick look at the MarketingExperiments Optimization Sequence formula:

Opr > Oprn > Ocnn ©

Wherein:
Opr = Optimize Product Factor
Oprn = Optimize Presentation Factor
Ocnn = Optimize Channel Factor

As you can see in the formula, you must ensure you have an effective value proposition before you try to express it to prospects.

Of course, this can be the biggest challenge for marketers. First, admit your product has a problem. And then second, investing the resources and (in some cases) political capital to try to improve it.

In this case, social media can be your friend as well. Don’t just use services like Twitter as a one-way communication tool. Listen to what your customers are saying about you. Use this feedback, combined with other ways of communicating with (not to) your customers, to find ways to improve your product and build a case internally to invest in these improvements.

Grab the zeitgeist and don’t look back

If you look closely at how Domino’s Pizza applied these principles, they didn’t do it in a vacuum. The name of their campaign is The Pizza Turnaround.

The word Turnaround has been splashed all over the news in the past few years. With the biggest financial and automotive companies in the world needing government assistance to stay solvent, and then looking to make changes to return to profitability, the public has gotten quite used to companies needing to improve the way they do business.

So if you haven’t yet, now is a quite auspicious time to begin applying the principles of Transparent Marketing. Heck, even the notoriously broody band Pearl Jam has been writing about making a turnaround of sorts. As Eddie Vedder sings in the recent song “The Fixer”…

When something’s dark
Lemme shed a little light on it

When something’s cold
Lemme put a little fire on it

When something’s broke
I wanna put a little fixing on it

 Transparent Marketing: A slice of honesty from Domino’s Pizza

Optimizing PPC Campaigns For Non-US Markets

Do you sometimes feel you can’t squeeze any more performance out of your campaigns? You’ve optimized everything, and you just can’t boost performance much further?

Have you looked at your international options?

Articles on PPC tend to focus on the US market. Let’s take a look at the massive opportunities in the international market, from a US perspective.

Untapped Markets

The US, whilst the biggest search market, still only accounts for approximately 17 percent of searches conducted globally.

According to ComScore’s 2010 search survey:

China ranked second with 13.3 billion searches, followed by Japan with 9.2 billion and the U.K. with 6.2 billion. Among the top ten global search markets, Russia posted the highest gains in 2009, growing 92 percent to 3.3 billion, followed by France (up 61 percent to 5.4 billion) and Brazil (up 53 percent to 3.8 billion)

As you can see, there’s a lot of search volume to be had beyond the US, even if you limit your market to the larger English speaking nations, like Australia and the UK.

Also, being a US-based PPC operative, you may have a serious advantage in those markets.

If you’ve been doing PPC in the US for a while, and you’ve mastered intermediate-advanced techniques, you may be able to out-compete international PPC operators in their local markets, because they haven’t had to fight so hard. Lower levels of competition means campaigns may be run a bit looser than what you’re used to. A generalization, of course, but generally true of less competitive markets.

And there’s another advantage: exchange rate.

Given the US dollar is currently weaker against some other major currencies, you can make bank on the exchange rate alone.

For example, the UK pound is, at the time of writing, worth $1.54 US. If you price your merchandise/services in pounds, without converting, you gain a 50% margin. People spend a UK £ pretty much like you spend a US $, so, depending on your market, you may not have to adjust your price figures.

But before you think it might be too easy, here’s where the locals may out-gun you….

The Challenge

Whilst most aspects of your PPC campaign will remain the same – your bidding strategy, CTR, Quality Score etc – there are differences you need to consider.

1. Pitch

Generally speaking, advertising targeted at US consumers is different to the advertising targeted at, say, UK consumers.

US advertising tends to be seen by more reserved cultures as brash and over-the-top. In order to appeal to consumers in the UK, tone down a hard pitch a few notches.

The easiest way to find the right level is examine the landing pages of competitors in your target market. It’s not just that spelling is different i.e. color vs colour – the underlying psychology is different. This is a generalization, but notice that not all cultures are as optimistic and motivated by personal success as the US. Benefit propositions tend not be pushed quite so hard.

An article in the Independent, a UK newspaper, highlighted the differences in the advertising world: Less business, more arts and entertainment:.

In Britain, advertising and its people are socially smart in the wider world in direct ratio to their distance from hard selling and their resemblance to the arts and entertainment. And advertising people definitely take their place in our great world.

In America, advertising isn’t that socially glamorous – they’ve got Hollywood after all – and its practitioners aren’t so famous, but they make millions and it’s an acceptable career choice for a decent MBA graduate who thinks creativity is something best left to window-dressers.

That’s not directly applicable to the direct marketing channel, but it gives you some idea of different underlying culture behind advertising and acceptance thereof. The good news, for US advertisers, is that the web is making everything more American. People are growing more accustomed to the hard sell, online, at least.

Again, study your competitors in terms of pitch, and revise accordingly.

If your budget allows, try to hire a copywriter based in the target market to adjust your copy.

2. .co.uk and com.au

Having a local domain name, and indicators of local presence, can help.

Just as you are likely to notice domain names that don’t end in .com, people in other countries are typically more comfortable buying from domains with local extensions, particularly when it comes to the delivery of physical items. It doesn’t tend to matter so much for merchandise or services that are delivered digitally.

It also helps if you can provide a local free calling number, and if possible, a local service address.

This is not to say any of this is necessary. People will buy from anywhere, if the deal is right.

3. Price In Local Currency

How do you feel if you see a checkout denominated in a currency other than US dollars? It can be off-putting. It can feel more risky. Same goes for people in local markets.

If you can, provide local pricing information. If not, at least provide a currency exchange widget.

4. Translation English To English

If you’re doing the ad writing and copywriting yourself, don’t forget the obvious stuff – terminology and spelling.

Here’s a useful translation dictionary for different spelling and terms.

Video: Creating Apps Using Titanium Mobile

Jeff Haynie from Appcelerator recently gave a presentation to the DFW WordPress Meetup group at the Dallas Art Institute covering the Titanium Mobile App development platform. During his talk he showed how the Titanium Mobile platform makes it easy for anyone who knows javascript, css, and html to create an app that runs natively on a mobile device.

This video is a recording from the session. Admittedly the video quality didn’t come out as good as I would have liked, but the audio is nice and clear. I decided to strip the audio and post it here as well, just in case you wanted to listen instead of watch.

Download the MP3 Version

Jeff covers some very interesting mobile app industry statistics and near the end of the presentation he touches on the ability to track mobile app usage which was pretty insightful.

You can get a closeup look at his presentation slides below, if you’d like to follow along with the video.

I’d like to thank the Art Institute of Dallas staff who volunteered the use of their camera tripod so that I could get the camera high enough to record more than people heads. Next time I’ll probably take the Kodak Zi8 and get an HD, center stage recording of events. But for now, this one will have to do the trick.

I also took notes for you during the event. Yes, the other kids liked to copy off of me in school.

Charles McKeever
OpenSourceMarketer.com

Learn how to build and market your business online using open source tools.

 Video: Creating Apps Using Titanium Mobile

Email Subject Lines: Do symbols hurt email marketing response?

Editor’s Note: The MarketingExperiments community is an interactive group with a great deal of questions and answers between marketers and their peers as well as with the MarketingExperiments staff. Occasionally we publish these interactions on the blog when we think there is a particularly good question that our readers can benefit from…

QUESTION:

I recently watched The Five Best Ways to Optimise Email Response seminar by Dr Flint McGlaughlin. I found it extremely enlightening and it provided a lot of food for thought. However, I have a quick question with regards to slide no. 22.

I appreciate your time and I’m sure you receive plenty of mailings of this nature; therefore I will get straight to the point.

In this slide, the recommendation is to change the subject line of the mailing from “Thank You For Making Us Your Florist Of Choice” to “15% Off – Our Way Of Saying Thank You!”

I understand why the wording would be changed to make it more endearing to the receiver but I wondered if the symbols added would increase the risk of the mailing being filtered and more inclined to be highlighted as spam – therefore reducing the success of the mailing. 2964298027 a32d8f75bc 300x233 Email Subject Lines: Do symbols hurt email marketing response?

In my experience I steer clear of any symbols in the subject line when sending large mail shots, especially %, ! and £. Am I being too cautious?

Kind regards,

Chris, BA(hons) Business & Marketing
Marketing
London

ANSWER:

Hi, Chris. Thanks for your question.

If I might broaden the question slightly to interpret its essence as a transferrable principle, could I restate it as…

How much validity is there to the conventional wisdom that, in the Subject Line of an offer email message, numbers, certain symbols (especially £/€/$, %, and !) and “SPAM words” such as “Free” and “discount” will cause a dramatic reduction in deliverability, and consequently effectiveness?

… if so, then it’s surely an important one.

In the case of the particular company and study referred to on Slide 22 – that was precisely one of the questions we set out to answer.

What you couldn’t see in the context of Dr. McGlaughlin’s presentation at the MarketingSherpa Email Summit in Miami is that this particular two-treatment comparative vignette was just a tiny part of a much larger and broader study. We intended to test the specific, widely accepted presumption you mentioned.

We were also exploring a host of other best practices to see how valid they remained through the evolution of regulations as well technical filter changes by email service providers (ESPs) since the time they were first introduced and anecdotally adopted (around 2003-2005).

This was important because we know from our foundational Offer/Response-Optimization principles of “clarity trumps persuasion” and “specificity converts,” that the clearer and more specific subject line – i.e., the one with the “15% Off…” copy – should convert better.

What we found was that there was, in fact, a small but significant difference in deliverability – interestingly, it was more pronounced among the smaller ESPs. In addition, as we had predicted based on the “eme” heuristic, the Open Rate actually declined (…by more than 25%).

In the end, though, the central research question was “Which email subject line will result in the greatest projected net revenue?” As revealed in Dr. McGlaughlin’s presentation, despite the slight dip in Delivery Rate, and the (what would otherwise have been alarming) drop in Open Rate, the Click-through Rate (CTR) to the landing page was 60.3% higher.

What he may not have mentioned is that, in direct answer to the research question, the Treatment subject line yielded a 56% increase in projected net revenue vs. the Control.

So, while it appears there is still at least some validity to the commonly held belief that special characters in the email Subject Line reduces deliverability, our research (this experiment plus two others conducted with different products and industries) suggests that when they serve to do so, these negative factors are dwarfed by the power of clarity.

I hope that’s helpful, Chris.

All the best,

Bob Kemper
Director of Sciences
MECLABS Group, LLC

Dr. McGlaughlin will next be teaching and speaking about email marketing at MarketingSherpa Email Marketing Germany 2010 in Munich on March 8th and 9th.

Dr. McGlaughlin’s four-hour workshop and keynote presentation will cover email capture rate and quality, open rates, conversion, and building customer trust and loyalty with email. He will also be conducting live optimization of audience submissions – a lively and always-popular segment.

 Email Subject Lines: Do symbols hurt email marketing response?

Crack Babies on Twitter

social network Crack Babies on Twitter

Note: This post should have been published a week ago, but I’ve been absolutely buried creating video lessons for the membership so this article was overlooked. You should probably read the last post on the topic of Twitter if you haven’t already. So, here we go…

Like donuts, Twitter can make your stomach churn like the cheap glazing that envelopes it.

I jumped into Twitter this week, because I was tired of the beatings I was getting from everyone who told me I needed to be on Twitter. Call it a turn-off, but being an introvert, I have never been comfortable with speed dating, much less telling my life story to potentially millions of people.

What I have discovered, is that people fall into 3 categories in Twitter:

    1. Cliques
    2. TV personalities
    3. Salespeople

Very, very few people manage to be a real person on Twitter. I say that, because in general, once you begin selling things, you tend to lose the interest of your friends. Someone who can be honest yet still sell something, falls in the cracks between the Twitter types. We’ll just refer to them as “Crack Babies” from now on.

The Cool Clique

When you run across the Twitter user who is talking with friends, you get the distinct impression that you are walking up to the “cool” clique in high school wearing last year’s fad clothing (you know, the parachute pants that your mom finally saw on sale a year after they went out of fashion. Thanks, mom). You obviously weren’t meant to know what they are talking about and the only way you will ever find out, is if you follow every single person that they are following (i.e. that creepy guy in the corner who keeps looking at you. I promise, that wasn’t me).

So these friends are successfully using Twitter as another means to communicate. Obviously, email, phone, texting, and chat simply weren’t enough. Now they must take their private conversations into another forum where people can SEE that they are being private. I saw one fellow had 24 tweets in the last week screaming belligerently at people to UNFOLLOW him. Now, you would THINK that he would have just clicked on the checkbox in his settings that doesn’t let people follow him (i.e. “Protect my tweets”), but he sounded like screaming at people was his version of fun.

Heeeeerrrrrrreee’ssssss JOHNNY!!!!

TV people. Yes, there are quite a number of people who are proudly tweeting to the world in their parachute pants and aren’t really talking to anyone in particular. They are there to tweet themselves without regard to social etiquette, making money, or any politically correct needs. This reminds me of what Bloggers began as. They wanted to put their ideas out there and see if anyone else in the world thinks like they do.

These people are fun to follow and read their thoughts, but there really isn’t any communication going on. It is all one-way. They will never follow you back, except as maybe a tip of the hat gesture.

“Where people’s eyes are, the marketing dollars (or marketing people) will follow”

Now my favorite ones. Someone whose sole goal is to profit off of everyone they meet. Here are the tweets from one person I ran across today:

    tweet: MAKE TONS OF MONEY ONLINE HERE ====> http://something or other

    tweet: GENERATE MASSIVE TRAFFIC TO YOUR WEBSITE FOR $$$$$$$

    tweet: LEARN HOW TO USE TWITTER FOR MAJOR PROFIT

    tweet: help, I can’t make my $2500 payment on my house this month and it is about to foreclose. can anyone do anything?

Yes, these were all from a single person. I admit, I was mesmerized by the all caps and that last tweet of hers gave me a good laugh. Obviously, she wasn’t following her own links since if she had, she wouldn’t be having these mortgage issues icon smile Crack Babies on Twitter

All of this goes back to my original thought of “don’t sell me something, give me something to believe in…..you”. I’m a long term thinker and I tend to hang back and see if what someone is professing is really on the level. Usually, salespeople are long gone by then, so time is a great filter. Twitter is no different. If all I ever see from you is a sales pitch, then I see no reason to continue listening.

It’s not like you can’t spot these people a mile away. They immediately DM you via an automated tool and either try to send you to a website for a sales pitch, sell you something in the DM, or ask you a question ( which you can’t reply to because their automated tool hasn’t automatically followed you yet).

I tend to randomly follow the people who others I like are following. I figured that this would limit the number of followers that I would need to unfollow and it sort of fits into the whole “social objects” theory. This technique doesn’t seem to be working for me all that well.

Crack Babies

There are a handful of people who manage to make a living by just being themselves and recommending items they like and use. When they tweet, they are telling you the good, bad and ugly about whatever they are doing. Being transparent is a key ingredient to trust.

I went to an Affiliate Summit recently and people kept wanting me to recommend odd products that I have never used nor would want to (i.e. colon cleanser, face cream, online faxing, etc.). If I want to clean my colon, I can go to a any local Mexican food buffet for a lot cheaper. I would never tell someone to get a fax. If someone is still using a fax machine, they need some serious technical help, not an affiliate program.

So how do all of these salespeople elevate themselves to the rank of Crack Baby? Simple… BE HONEST.

Toff Ward
Open Source Marketer

Accelerate your business online using Facebook.

 Crack Babies on Twitter

Test Your Marketing Intuition: Which email delivered the highest click-through rate?

To wrap up our email response optimization trilogy, today’s free web clinic will focus on live optimization of audience-submitted emails.

Our roundtable of research analysts will use your peers’ email messages to share transferable principles that you can use to improve the ROI of your email sends. To give you a firm understanding about what the MarketingExperiments methodologies are based on, we’ll begin the clinic with the below experiment.

As always on web clinic day, we’re giving you an opportunity to use your experience and intuition to see if you can guess which treatment won…

Background: An established financial institution offering online savings accounts

Test Design: This was an A/B/C/D multi-factorial test that pitted three treatments against the control. While we also split traffic between different landing pages to test which combination produced the highest conversion rate, today we’ll focus on which email increased click-through rate. Here are the email versions (out of courtesy to the Research Partner, we have anonymized these email messages):

(click to zoom in)

Control

RBC11 Test Your Marketing Intuition: Which email delivered the highest click through rate?

Treatment 1

RBC21 Test Your Marketing Intuition: Which email delivered the highest click through rate?

Treatment 2

RBC3 268x300 Test Your Marketing Intuition: Which email delivered the highest click through rate?

Treatment 3

RBC4 300x272 Test Your Marketing Intuition: Which email delivered the highest click through rate?

Results: Before we reveal the results, here’s a chance to test your own marketing intuition and be regarded as an online marketing leader! Use the comments section to let us know which email message you think delivered the highest click-through rate.

Which email generated the highest click-through?

* Control
* Treatment 1
* Treatment 2
* Treatment 3

We’ll post the name of the marketer who guessed the winning email and came closest to the click-through rate gain, so make sure to include your name, title, company, Twitter handle or any other info you would like to include.

The winner and results for this experiment will also be announced live this afternoon at 4 p.m. EST during our free web clinic – The Five Best Ways to Optimize Email Response (Part 3): Special live optimization web clinic.

Congratulations to Stefanie Kelly of Pathway Medical Staffing, the only marketer with the intuition to guess what our tests have confirmed Treatment 1 delivered the highest click-through rate.

This copy-rich email outperformed the control by 42% by synchronizing to the decision patterns of the recipient through a commonality of language. This email carries a very personal feel and is crafted to capture the recipients’ attention and convince them to click through to the landing page.

 Test Your Marketing Intuition: Which email delivered the highest click through rate?

Twitter Clowns

twitter clowns Twitter Clowns

FULL DISCLOSURE: I’m new to Twitter. Really, really new. I’m not using any of the automatic tools.

Some of the things I am noticing are not impressive. Twitter isn’t bad itself, but how people are using it begs the question, “are you joking?”.

For instance, today I searched for a topic I was interested in learning about. I saw 3 people with good comments, so I followed them. I have no idea if this is how Twitter intended it to work, but intuitively, it seemed like the thing to do. I want to learn, so I am going to listen to people who are talking about that topic.

I immediately get a Direct message from one of the people telling me “thank you” for following them (seems polite to me) and then asking me a question.

Cool, I see this as someone is really on the ball and using Twitter to really expand their network. I’m psyched and so I click “reply” and immediately type out a response to their question. Lo and behold, when I click on the “send” button I am gifted an error from Twitter that tells me I can’t send a Direct Message back to the person who sent one to me because they are not following me.

WHAT???

Why would someone send a question in a direct message knowing that I can’t answer them?

Ah, third party tools are obviously being used. They also seem to be used incorrectly. I’m betting that this person is using a tool to automagically deliver a response to someone who follows them. I’m betting that they wanted to say someone nice and make sure to interact with whoever is now following them. Interaction is good. Responsiveness is also good. Ending the potential conversation with a slap upside the head doesn’t give me a warm and fuzzy first impression.

How about example number 2:

in the same day as before, I saw someone’s name next to a post that interested me, so I clicked to follow them. I immediately got a direct message that said, “We should connect on Facebook!”.

WHOA!!!!?!!!!!

That’s the social equivalent of asking a girl out for coffee and her response is, “what do you think we should name our first 4 children? Let’s go meet my parents now”.

Hang on a second. I don’t know anything about you other than your obvious psychosis. Again, I clicked on the “reply” button to send a hopefully politically correct response like, “can we just have coffee first?”. And again, I am greeted by an error in Twitter about how this person is not following me so I can’t respond to their direct message.

Ouch. So exactly how do I contact these people in order to tell them that they have completely lost out on a first impression? If I do a Mention, then I embarrass them in front of Twitterville (Twitterland, TwitterWorld, Isle De Twit) and make myself look conceited or snobbish as though I know everything (obviously, I know very little about Twitter).

So, I simply unfollow and continue trying to find people to learn from. Using the automated tools only works for you when you understand how and why you are using them (i.e. focus on the concept, not the tool).

Toff Ward
Open Source Marketer

Accelerate your business online using Twitter.

 Twitter Clowns

How To Add A Google Buzz Button To Your Blog

In my effort to embrace Google Buzz in preparation for it’s future takeoff (who knows if it will happen), I’ve added a Google Buzz button to the blog. Now you can “Buzz” a post you find interesting, stupid, off-the-wall crazy, or whatever.
In case you don’t already know how to add this to your blog, I [...]

Thank you for subscribing to Blueverse!

How To Add A Google Buzz Button To Your Blog

 How To Add A Google Buzz Button To Your Blog  How To Add A Google Buzz Button To Your Blog  How To Add A Google Buzz Button To Your Blog

 How To Add A Google Buzz Button To Your Blog

Yes, I was a Google Buzz killer…until…

I admit, I wasn’t (and still am really not) a Google Buzz fan. Probably the biggest reason is because I hate feeling like I have yet MORE messages waiting for me to go through. I like keeping my inboxes tidy and I’m a terrible multi-tasker with the biggest offender being email. So when Google fired [...]

Thank you for subscribing to Blueverse!

Yes, I was a Google Buzz killer…until…

 Yes, I was a Google Buzz killer…until…  Yes, I was a Google Buzz killer…until…  Yes, I was a Google Buzz killer…until…

 Yes, I was a Google Buzz killer…until…

With Google AdWords, Is The Long Tail Over-Rated?

Do you manage too many keywords in your PPC campaigns? Feeling a bit overwhelmed?

There’s a lot to be said for running small, tightly optimized campaigns with short keyword lists instead.

When Chris Anderson, a columnist at Wired magazine, wrote about the Long Tail back in 2004, the concept was seized upon by the search marketing community. The Long Tail outlines a niche sales strategy whereby a vendor can sell a wide range of niche items, in small volumes, which collectively add up to more revenue than their big sellers. Think Amazon. By covering many niches, you make more money.

Search marketers seized upon the Long Tail concept because it dove-tails nicely with search strategy. You can use an infinite numbers of keywords, some of which may only receive one click a year, but added together, they provide a lot of traffic at low cost.

This theory works best in SEO, where there is nothing to manage after you’ve published a page, but in PPC, covering a lot of keyword terms can create management overhead, and affect Quality Score, which drives up your costs.

Which Terms Drive Performance?

Your top 5-10% performing keywords are likely generating almost all your sales. The PPC Long Tail, all those groups of low-traffic keywords, are probably generating nothing but mental overhead. Such campaigns can be tricky to manage well.

Your Quality Score may also suffer if you run long keyword lists. If you’re using an exhaustive list of terms covering areas where there is little buyer activity – the do-it-yourself brigade, for starters – your click through rate could suffer, which can affect your Quality Score. Your minimum bids could rise, so running with the Long Tail could in fact cost you.

Go through your lists and make a note of the low traffic keyword terms. Can any of these keyword terms be covered by broad or phrase matches? What about a combination of broad & phrase match with the addition of some negative keywords? Would you lose anything by doing so? Is the existence of these keywords helping or hindering you ability to meet your sales objectives? Look at the terms that generate your conversions. How many really perform? 20? 50? Would you be better off focusing all your mental energy on these keywords? Are you wasting time testing long tail keywords and ad copy that will take a long time to prove their worth? Is it time for a PPC spring clean?

Running Long Tail Strategy

Of course, some people swear by long keyword lists and running a huge number of groups. This strategy can and does work. Keep in mind that campaigns that receive huge volumes – millions – of clicks at the top end can include a lot of low-performance keywords further down the tail without it affecting the Quality Score too much, but smaller operators may not have this luxury. Few click-thrus, across a wide campaign, can hurt the keyword terms that perform well.

Long Tail keyword terms can also be useful for testing purposes. There might be gold down there somewhere! Again, it’s all about how much time you want to spend on testing and management of terms that deliver limited testing data over long periods of time.

ROI

Whatever method you choose, the important factor to look at the return on investment.

When calculating ROI, don’t forget to build in your keyword management time, and the opportunity cost of that time – would you have been better off managing some other aspect of the campaign, such as landing pages? Use of the Google Desktop Ad Manager or the Google API can improve efficiency, but frequently it is best to focus on improving lifetime visitor value and conversion rates before digging too deep into longtail keywords.

Most importantly, is your Quality Score affected by having too many low paying keyword terms?

What strategies do you use? Do you go for the short, focused campaign in terms of keyword lists and groups, or do you like to cast a very wide net?